# Meeting minutes: July 21 2021 (UTC) UDRAL call

**URL:** <https://forum.opencyphal.org/t/meeting-minutes-july-21-2021-utc-udral-call/1365>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [July 21, 2021, 5:11pm UTC](https://forum.opencyphal.org/t/meeting-minutes-july-21-2021-utc-udral-call/1365 "2021-07-21T17:11:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![auturgy](https://forum.opencyphal.org/user_avatar/forum.opencyphal.org/auturgy/32/845_2.png) [@auturgy](https://forum.opencyphal.org/u/auturgy)\
**Post date:** [July 21, 2021, 9:50pm UTC](https://forum.opencyphal.org/t/meeting-minutes-july-21-2021-utc-udral-call/1365/2 "2021-07-21T21:50:57Z")

</div>

Thanks @coder_kalyan  
For me the key take away is that it is clear that the design goals of v1, and use-case requirements for the main implementers, are not completely aligned (with the benefit of hindsight I’d suggest that this is a direct result of the limited representation and involvement of PX4 and ArduPilot in the Stockholm Summit and early design of v1).  
The bulk of the call was basically to-ing and fro-ing about “how do we use an architecture designed for high level distributed computing as a low level sensor network”.  
An important point, and one which should give comfort to manufacturers, is that there was clear intent expressed by both PX4 (@dagar) and ArduPilot (@tridge) to achieve a common standard for this use case. What that will look like is not yet clear.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.opencyphal.org/t/meeting-minutes-july-21-2021-utc-udral-call/1365)._